Order and Filings
Dated May 13, 2018
Fresh as Amended Pleadings:
Order Dismissing TD’s Summary Judgment Motion to Dismiss the Claim – click here
Dated November 9, 2015
TD Bank Motion Record – click here
Dated October 10, 2014
Reply Motion Record (TD Bank) – motion for summary judgment – click here
Dated February 13, 2015
Affidavits:
• Affidavit of Beverly M. Jacobs – click here Dated November 13, 2014
• Affidavit of John Carrington – click here Dated December 16,2014
• Affidavit of Marcus A. Wide – click here – Dated November 28, 2014
– Exhibits A-C to Affidavit of Marcus A. Wide – click here
– Exhibits D-K to Affidavit of Marcus A. Wide – click here
– Exhibits L-O to Affidavit of Marcus A. Wide – click here
– Exhibits P-S to Affidavit of Marcus A. Wide – click here
• Affidavit of Omari Osbourne – click here – Dated November 13, 2014
• Affidavit of Peter R. Wiltshire – click here – Dated November 28, 2014
• Second Affidavit of Peter R. Wiltshire – click here – Dated January 16, 2015
• Third Affidavit of Peter Wiltshire – click here – March 26 2015
– Exhibits A-Z to Affidavit of Peter R. Wiltshire – click here
– Exhibits AA-EE to Affidavit of Peter R. Wiltshire – click here
– Exhibits A-D2 of Second Affidavit of Peter R. Wiltshire – click here
– Exhibits D3-D4 of Second Affidavit of Peter R. Wiltshire – click here
– Exhibits E1-E10 of Second Affidavit of Peter R. Wiltshire – click here
– Exhibits E11-E22 of Second Affidavit of Peter R. Wiltshire – click here
– Exhibits E23-E25 of Second Affidavit of Peter R. Wiltshire – click here
– Exhibits E26-E33 of Second Affidavit of Peter R. Wiltshire – click here
– Exhibits E34-E40 of Second Affidavit of Peter R. Wiltshire – click here
– Exhibits E41-E54 of Second Affidavit of Peter R. Wiltshire – click here
– Exhibits E55-J1 of Second Affidavit of Peter R. Wiltshire – click here
– Exhibits J2-J4 of Second Affidavit of Peter R. Wiltshire – click here
– Exhibits J4-J5 of Second Affidavit of Peter R. Wiltshire – click here
– Exhibits J6-K of Second Affidavit of Peter R. Wiltshire – click here
– Exhibits L-M of Second Affidavit of Peter R. Wiltshire – click here
• Affidavit of Ralph S. Janvey – click here – December 1, 2014
• Affidavit of William R. Tacon – click here – December 15, 2014
• Second Affidavit of William Tacon – click here – April 20 2015
ORDER AND ADDENDUM RE NOTICE TO CREDITORS Re NET WINS AND PREFERENCES – click here
Dated May 30, 2014
AMENDED CLAIM FILED against “TD Bank” – Amended Statement of Claim
Dated April 11, 2014
Dated March 11, 2013
Creditors may file responses to the application with the Antiguan court at any time before the date on which comes before the Court for hearing. The Joint Liquidators will advise as to the date of the hearing and thus, the exact deadline, as soon as the hearing is scheduled, although the Court may schedule the hearing at short notice and Creditors are advised to file any responses as soon as they are able.
Dated March 11, 2013
JL SECOND ADVISORY AND APPENDIX – Case 3:09-CV-00721-N
Dated May 11, 2012
STANFORD ADVISORY OF OBJECTIONS – Case 3:09-CV-0721-N
Dated April 20, 2012
INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS – Index to Pleadings
Dated May 12, 2011
INJUNCTION PROCEEDINGS – Claim No. 478-2011
Dated July 20, 2011
COURT ORDER – Appointment of New Liquidators of SIB – Claim No. ANUHCV 2009/0149
Dated May 12, 2011
CONSENT FREEZING ORDER – Summary:
1. The original order remains in force as against RAS, who is still unrepresented.
2. Andrea Stoelker is released from being a direct respondent to the order, but remains indirectly bound by it to the extent she is an agent or facilitator for the remaining respondents. She also remains as defendant to the Antiguan law suit.
3. The land assets we have identified in Antigua remain frozen. They can be sold, but the Estate has an opportunity to challenge the valuations.
4. The corporate respondents can meet normal business expenditure (as before).
5. We have the ability to monitor SDC’s bank account electronically.
6. All revenue generated by the corporate defendants has to be paid into SDC’s bank account referred to at para 5 above.
7. The corporate defendants have to give certain disclosure of what non real estate assets they each have, and their value. We can challenge these values if we wish.
To read the order, please press here.